Good morning, and welcome to the
Essential California newsletter. It’s
Friday, June 7, and I’m reporting from Los Angeles.
Anyone who says L.A. has no history has never been to the La Brea Tar Pits, where mammal fossils dating back to the last Ice Age have been found in the sticky asphalt. The tar pits and the accompanying George C. Page Museum have become landmarks in their own right, serving as a tourist standby and appearing in countless movies. The park, which borders LACMA, also remains an active site for scientific research, with paleontologists excavating there 361 days a year.
But change may soon be afoot for the 12-acre site.
On Thursday afternoon, officials from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, which manages the site, announced that they would be
undertaking a new master plan. Three architectural firms have already been chosen to develop separate proposals for that plan, which will be presented to the public in August.
[Read “The La Brea Tar Pits are getting a makeover. Here’s why”by Carolina Miranda]Any potential plan will ride an existing wave of change near the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue, where a Purple Line subway stop is slated to open in 2023. The Renzo Piano-designed Academy Museum of Motion Pictures is nearing completion, and
Peter Zumthor’s LACMA redesign will probably break ground next year. Suffice it to say, the
starchitects have landed.
So, what does this all mean for the tar pits and a changing Miracle Mile? I spoke to
arts and culture writer Carolina Miranda, who is indisputably the coolest person at the Los Angeles Times, about the tar pits, architectural spectacle and a changing Wilshire.
Is there any other L.A. street with a larger concentration of starchitecture than what will soon exist here?I think Grand Avenue is probably it. On Grand Avenue, you have the Rafael Moneo Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, Frank Gehry’s Disney Hall, Arata Isozaki’s MOCA and the Diller Scofidio + Renfro Broad museum. That is probably L.A.’s other giant cluster of starchitecture. But this is shaping up to be the second one.
[Check out the Grand Avenue project for more on the street]What does that kind of starchitecture cluster mean for a person experiencing the city? Do these pieces interact with each other, or is it just a bunch of clashing spectacle?That really depends on the urban planning that goes along with it. Except for Frank Gehry’s Disney Hall, which is the most externally facing, what you see on Grand Avenue is a lot of more inward-facing buildings. The cathedral has that great plaza, and it faces inward. MOCA has a great place to eat in that courtyard, but you don’t see it until you actually descend the stairs. Those are not buildings that play well with each other.
Everybody’s trying to be an icon. We need more buildings just trying to be a city.
What about Wilshire and Fairfax?What is going to happen here is unclear. I think it’s a smart thing for the Page Museum to be undertaking the development of a master plan now. This area is set to change extensively if the new LACMA gets built and once the new Metro comes in, in terms of what crowdflow into this space will be like.
The way that the tar pits currently connect to LACMA and ultimately the Academy Museum — it’s like everyone came and plopped down their thing and nobody thought about how one thing would connect to the next. I think this plan is an attempt to think about that, along with the site’s existing infrastructure. The museum was completed in 1977. A lot has been discovered on the site since then. Issues of environmental degradation and climate change are much more important than when the museum first opened.
Are we potentially going to see a new iconic structure here? Or will the building stay the same?I think that’s still up in the air. That’s part of why they’re looking at architects who’ve done renovations before, and worked on sites where an infrastructure was already there. They might come in and say, “The Page is great, it just needs some updating.” Or they might say, “You know what, the Page isn’t working for your needs and we might need a new building.” That’s part of what this master planning process is supposed to answer.
Does L.A. have a good track record of updating our classic spaces?Hmm. The example of
Parker Center and County General do not offer a hopeful track record, in terms of L.A.’s attention to older landmarks and how we can work with them rather than raze them and start over.
At the same time — and this is something that a lot of modernist preservationists are contending with — the lifespan of a lot of modernist buildings just wasn’t what some Beaux-Arts palace of the late 19th century would be. In many cases, these buildings have shorter lifespans.
And now, and
here’s what’s happening across California:
No comments:
Post a Comment