Good morning, and welcome to the
Essential California newsletter. It’s
Friday, May 24, and I’m writing from Los Angeles.
Yesterday, my colleague Doug Smith — a powerhouse Metro reporter who has been at the paper for nearly five decades — published
a big story about
systemic inequity in Inglewood.
The city had spent millions of dollars in public funds to
soundproof middle-class areas of the city, but
bypassed one of the poorest neighborhoods where the sound from the LAX flight path is actually loudest. (The wealthier neighborhoods that got the soundproofing were on the east side of the city, furthest from the airport.)
The city wasn’t without its reasons: Decades ago, officials had decided to eliminate homes where the noise exposure was greatest and rezoned the area to industrial. However, some of that redevelopment never came about and homes remained in the loudest area. And despite housing the residents whose lives are most disrupted by the noise, their location in an industrial zone made them ineligible for soundproofing funds and improvements.
[Read “Poor neighborhoods endure worst LAX noise but are left out of home soundproofing program” by Doug Smith]Doug is a longtime data reporter who excels at finding the ragged edges where public policy meets real people’s lives — people like Inglewood resident Jose Peralta, whose windows rattle every two to five minutes from the deafening roar of the jetliners above. The inequities at play would be obvious to anyone who has seen a map that overlays Inglewood zoning with the areas where soundproofing has occurred, but who would ever think to build that map?
I called Doug up to find out how he found the story.
How did you discover that Inglewood was disproportionately soundproofing in more middle-class neighborhoods?This was actually kind of a spinoff from the Clippers story.
[Doug had previously written about the basketball team’s bid to streamline construction of a new arena in Inglewood.] I was curious how the city acquired that property. I was looking at that and realized that the property the city had bought with a combination of redevelopment funds and airport improvement program funds was not in the middle of the [airport noise] footprint. It was in the outer edges of the footprint. I was focused on that and I realized I should actually take a look at the soundproofing.
So, I went to the city and I asked them for a list of the assessor information numbers of all the properties they had soundproofed.
[Having those would allow him to map them.] I filed a public records request for that, and it took a while for them to respond, but they finally gave me 14 spreadsheets of assessor parcel numbers. I merged those all together and joined them to a GIS [mapping software] file of parcels.
And it just jumped out at me: Whoa, all of these in the noisiest area didn’t get soundproofed, but all these other ones out on the edges of the noise contour got soundproofed. What's going on here?
How did you start to figure it out?I kept asking people and nobody seemed to know. The director of the residential sound insulation program said, “I don’t know.”
If I had been able to find the right people at City Hall, I would have figured it out quickly. But the mayor keeps a tight lid on everything there, so they won’t talk to us. I had acquired hundreds of documents and I was just reading through them all. I finally found this guy’s name, as a former director of the residential sound insulation program. So I called him and we met, and he said maybe you should look at a zoning map. That brought the whole thing into perspective — I could see that that area had been zoned industrial. And then it didn’t take long to figure out this was something that happened in the early 1980s. Basically, the city wanted to tear out all those properties and turn it into businesses. It just never happened.
And now,
here’s what’s happening across California:
No comments:
Post a Comment