Good morning. Here’s what you need to know to start your day.
What would Nixon and Reagan think of Kamala Harris and her California?
Californians took a bit of pride when the presidential press corps stuffed their suitcases with casual wear and headed to the “Western White House.”
For Richard Nixon, it was a lavish spread near the beach in San Clemente. For Ronald Reagan, it was his beloved dusty horse ranch in the hills above Santa Barbara where he would escape the Beltway.
The image of Nixon strolling on the sand or Reagan chopping wood carried the symbolism that California’s political moment had arrived.
Has it come again with Kamala Harris?
We will know in a few weeks. Her rise to presidential candidate — with a key assist from San Francisco Democrat and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — marks a dramatic ascension of California to the center of national politics.
Nancy and Ronald Reagan on ranch in 1996. (AP Photo/File)
A different California
Much has been written about how California went from Nixon and Reagan country to Harris and Pelosi country (my colleague Mark Z. Barabak did an excellent series on this wider subject last year).
But gleaning parallels is difficult because our politics are so different.
Reagan and Nixon came to power in postwar Southern California, a boomtown of opportunity, suburban housing tracts and conservative politics that for at least a few decades felt like the future.
Nixon and Reagan cast themselves as warriors against the liberalism that began with the New Deal and spread to many parts of American life, from civil rights to a government safety net. They left behind a more conservative country.
It’s easy now to see the flaws in what back then seemed like such a powerful political narrative.
La Casa Pacifica in San Clemente, also known as President Nixon’s Western White House. (Courtesy Sherman Library & Gardens)
The suburban boom benefited many and lifted a generation economically. This prosperity did not extend to many minority groups, however, and California would pay a grave price for that inequality.
As suburbia spread, urban areas were neglected and people of color faced barriers in getting their piece of the golden dream. A car-dominated society built around cheap single-family homes brought crushing environmental problems we are still living with.
And the good times never roll forever. All that sunny prosperity was fueled in no small part by Cold War defense spending. The collapse of the Soviet Union (which Nixon and Reagan helped engineer) imploded Southern California’s growth machine. The aerospace industry shattered. Military bases closed. Cities slumped into decline.
In Downey, Queen Elizabeth II looks at the Apollo space capsule in 1983. (Larry Armstrong)
Power shift from SoCal to NorCal
Harris is the product of a different California, but one that has also profoundly influenced the world. Her career symbolized a larger shift in clout from south to north, both in political power and economic might.
She was born in Oakland to immigrant parents and rose to the top of the Democratic establishment in San Francisco and Sacramento before arriving in Washington. Her roots are the left-of-center politics of the Bay Area — and that region’s ties to the innovation economy that in little more than a generation has produced some of the world’s most powerful tech companies.
Harris supporters say she is the generational change America needs now — a unifying figure whose liberal values are tempered by her work as a prosecutor who can bring the best of California’s success to a national stage.
Would Nixon and Reagan agree with Harris supporters?
Or would they see in Donald Trump their conservative standard-bearer?
Reagan’s son Michael has said his father would not support Trump. Recent Nixon scholarship has focused on policies that look downright progressive when compared with the current GOP plank (for example, a book published a few years ago was titled “The Last Liberal Republican.”)
Nixon and Reagan were never shy about saying what they thought was wrong with California. Yet it’s hard to imagine these two Golden State boosters co-signing the dark vision of California that Trump outlined in his speech Saturday in Coachella. We can only speculate, of course. Nixon died in 1994, Reagan in 2004.
As California historian Kevin Starr famously said: “There has always been something slightly bipolar about California. It was either utopia or dystopia, a dream or a nightmare, a hope or a broken promise — and too infrequently anything in between.”
Today’s top stories
Vice President Kamala Harris and Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff walk through their L.A. neighborhood last year. (Christina House / Los Angeles Times)
For Harris’ L.A. neighbors, her house is a delight and an annoyance
The political committee behind Proposition 36 gave $1 million to the California Republican Party
- The donation indicates the confidence that proponents have about the anti-crime measure passing. It also shows a partisan allegiance for a campaign that portrayed itself as bipartisan.
- A solid majority of likely California voters support Prop. 36, which would impose stricter penalties for retail theft and crimes involving fentanyl, according to a recent poll co-sponsored by The Times.
Downtown L.A. takes another hit as a familiar tenant decides to move out
- Financial services firm Wedbush Securities is leaving the office tower that has been its headquarters for 24 years in favor of smaller offices in Pasadena.
- The move underscores the continued struggles of the office rental market after the pandemic — and the broader vulnerabilities in commercial real estate throughout L.A. County.
A New York City guide for L.A. people (Dodgers’ version)
What else is going on
No comments:
Post a Comment