Daryl Hall's lawsuit against John Oates could pull back the curtain on the secretive and booming music rights market, Axios' Dan Primack and Tim Baysinger write. - Why it matters: The growth of streaming music — coupled with the increase in licensing opportunities in TV shows, movies and video games — is increasing the value of holding song rights and making them attractive investments.
Catch up quick: Instead of licensing copyrights for a set amount of time, many artists are selling them outright to the highest bidder. - The benefit for the buyer depends on the deal. But investment firms view music rights as stable assets that likely won't depreciate.
🎸 State of play: Years ago, Hall and Oates sold part of their catalog. Now it appears that Oates recently agreed to sell at least some of his remaining rights. - Hall has long bemoaned the original deal and — under seal — sued to stop a new sale. The judge lifted some of it and said more information soon could be publicly disclosed.
- That's of particular interest, given how little we typically learn about these music rights deals.
🔎 Zoom in: Money is flowing back into the industry after a yearlong dry spell and some financial trouble around Hipgnosis, one of its biggest players. - Last week, Broadcast Music Inc. — a major holder of music rights — was sold in a deal that could be worth $1.7 billion, according to industry trade outlet Music Business Worldwide.
- Morgan Stanley is partnering with a large music publishing company to spend $700 million to acquire song copyrights.
- Katy Perry sold catalog rights to five of her albums for $225 million.
Share this story … Get Axios Pro Rata. |
No comments:
Post a Comment