Veteran
Los Angeles Times sports reporter John Cherwa has been on the horse racing beat for the last four years and writes
a regular horse racing newsletter. He
picked up his phone yesterday from the press box overlooking the track at
Santa Anita, where he was getting ready to cover three major races.
Has anything like this happened before?
Yes, it happened a couple of years ago
at Del Mar. It’s happened
at Aqueduct in New York and
Saratoga in New York. I don’t want to say these clusters are common, but they’re also not terribly unusual.
Was there a similar outcry around those previous clusters of horse deaths?
I don’t think it was as intense as it is here. American society has evolved through the years to the point where animals have a higher place in the heart than they did in the past. Plus, it’s California, which is a pretty progressive state. When this happens in Kentucky, people don’t think a lot about it, because people in Kentucky understand and accept the fact that horses die in horse racing. In California, people may not accept that quite as easily.
When it happened in New York, they were able to determine what the problem was. Here in California, they have some theories but they haven’t figured it out yet.
What are the theories for why this keeps happening at Santa Anita?
A lot of people keep bringing up the weather. There was 20-plus inches of rain over a very short period of time. On the surface that makes sense, but we’ve had rain in California before and you didn't have these sort of things happening. An outgrowth of the rain is that they've been “sealing the track,” which essentially means they press it down really hard, so that water can’t seep into the ground. But that makes for
a very hard surface. Some have speculated that the horses have contracted micro-fractures while running on that very hard surface. Those micro-fractures may not immediately show up, but maybe two or three races down the road it suddenly happens and you get the breakdowns.
[“Breakdown” doesn't necessarily mean a fatality. It’s a racing industry term that refers to “a catastrophic injury.”]
The Los Angeles district attorney’s office has assigned investigators to work with the California Horse Racing Board to investigate these deaths. But who oversees horse racing as an industry as whole?
That’s one of the problems with horse racing. There is no national body. It is run state-to-state and every state is different. Within the industry, there are three major players, and even they can't get together and agree on anything. It’s on this backdrop of great dysfunction that horse racing exists.
How does California compare with other states in terms of regulations?
Currently, California is probably the most heavily regulated state, because they just implemented a lot of new medication rules. They’re even exploring the idea of eliminating the whip, which is euphemistically called the riding crop.
Do these regulations actually make racing safer?
The measures that they’ve put in place really have no direct correlation to breakdowns. Like
eliminating or reducing the amount of Lasix [a common anti-bleeding medication] a horse can take on race day. There’s really no scientific evidence that says that Lasix has anything to do with breakdown. There is no evidence that riding crops or whipping of your horse has any correlation to breakdowns. But what they’re really dealing with right now is a public perception problem. Do people want horses running on medication? Do people want to see jockeys striking horses? The answer to those questions is no. And that’s why the rules they’ve implemented are more designed to help public perception than get to the root of the problem.
Not to sound crass, but how many horses typically die during a regular season? What's a "normal" number?
The metric that they use is in starts per thousand. California tracks are usually about 1.8 starts per thousand. So, for every thousand horses that start a race, somewhere around 1.8 die, or are involved in a fatal accident. They’ve reduced the number of fatalities by 60% in the last decade and half.
The reason the metric is measured that way is because it depends on the number of racing days you have. If you were to race 12 months a year, you would have a pretty big number. If you were to race two weeks a year, [you may not see any fatalities].
The thing is, if you’re going to have horse racing, horses are going to die. It is inevitable. The goal, of course, is to get to zero fatalities. That’s probably never attainable, no more than [it would be] driving on the road or flying on a plane or playing football, for that matter. But the number is high.
How healthy is the horse racing industry today, compared with where it was a generation or two ago?
It’s a shadow of itself. There were times back in the ’50s or ’60s, maybe even the ’70s, where on just an average weekend you’d have 40,000 people at a race track. Now, a really big crowd would be 20,000 people. Horse racing was the only legal form of gambling for a long time. So, if you wanted to gamble, this is where you came. It was huge. But the horse racing industry has been struggling. How long it will continue to exist — I don’t know. But if they don’t get their safety issues under control, it’s not going to be as long as they want it to be.
[Go deeper: “Racing experts discuss the future of the sport after rash of horse deaths at Santa Anita” by John Cherwa]
It would probably take a ballot referendum to abolish horse racing in California. Is that a possibility right now?
It would be a tall order. First of all, you need 635,000 signatures, which really means you need a million signatures because signatures get thrown out. The industry would easily put $50 million to a $100 million into opposing that kind of ballot measure. And not a lot of people really have an opinion or care about horse racing. If you don’t care or know about something on a ballot measure, human nature is to vote no. Plus, the animal rights community would need a few sugar daddies out there who would have to pony up a lot of money to try to compete with this.
The horse racing industry is very scared of a ballot initiative, but I think if you look at it dispassionately, you’d see that the hill would be pretty high to climb.
And now,
here’s what’s happening across California:
No comments:
Post a Comment